The Bank of England is poised to make a significant announcement this Thursday, February 6, regarding monetary policy that is expected to stir both financial markets and the political landscapeWith a third interest rate cut on the horizon, the central bank will concurrently be revising its outlook on the UK economy, downgrading growth expectations and forecasting a rise in inflation for the year aheadThis report may cast a shadow over Chancellor Rachel Reeves, putting her in a position where she must navigate adverse financial currents while addressing public concerns regarding economic stability.

Market analysts and economists are largely aligned in their predictions, anticipating a reduction of the benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points, bringing it down to 4.5%. This would mark the lowest rate since June 2023. A recent survey indicates that the decision is likely to reflect an 8-1 majority in favor of this easing.

The expectations for growth and inflation are particularly noteworthyIn the quarterly monetary policy report, the Bank will update its forecasts for economic expansion and inflation, providing clarity on how swiftly the economy can grow without triggering further inflationary pressuresBloomberg Economics analysts, Dan Hanson and Ana Andrade, project that the Bank may set the potential growth rate between 1% and 1.5%, consistent with their prior assessments from the previous year.

However, a significant number of economists are bracing for downward revisions to real GDP growth in 2025, 2026, and 2027. The anticipated pullback for 2025 seems to be directly attributed to weak economic performance, while adjustments for the following years hinge on tighter projected market interest rates compared to forecasts made in November 2022.

Moreover, economists surveyed expect that inflation predictions will be elevated due to stubbornly high food and energy pricesThis scenario suggests that the UK may enter a period of stagflation, thereby intensifying pressure on Chancellor Reeves just as she is due to deliver key remarks concerning economic growth initiatives

Advertisements

Tighter market interest rates are expected to lead to a downward adjustment in inflation expectations for 2026 and 2027.

Within the realm of monetary policy voting, there appears to be an expected dissent from only one member who will oppose the rate cut and advocate for maintaining the rate at 4.75%. This dissenter, Catherine Mann, is noted for her hawkish stance, contrasting sharply with her colleague Swati Dhingra, who is regarded as the most dovish member and may vote for a more aggressive 50 basis point cut.

Analysts from the Royal Bank of Canada recollect the dovish stance taken in the prior December meeting, where three members expressed support for a rate cutThe minutes revealed growing concerns about the economic outlookSince that meeting, conditions have only deteriorated, characterized by stagnation of the economy and a weakened labor market, exacerbated by the tax increase proposals put forth by Reeves on October 30.

Compounding this, the Bank of England faces a complex communication challengeSince November, fluctuations in the market interest path have stemmed from uncertainties surrounding U.S. monetary policy and its spillover effects on the UKLast November and December, Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey seemed to suggest the appropriateness of four cuts to 3.75% within the current yearYet, projections in February signal only two anticipated cuts, while the market has priced in expectations of three.

Should the Bank's forecasts indicate that inflation rates are significantly below its 2% target, there may be a need for more than two cuts by 2025. A loose monetary stance would suggest the economy might outpace current growth projections.

Looking ahead, the Bank of England is expected to maintain wording that indicates caution towards further easing, especially in light of the uncertainties stemming from comprehensive tariffs announced by the U.S. governmentThe Bank has previously articulated that a "gradual" approach implies four quarter-point cuts this year

Advertisements

Given the hawkish tendencies observed in the market since December, sticking to the current guidance could be interpreted as a challenge to market expectations.

Bank of America’s economists have expressed skepticism regarding a decisive shift to dovish policies this month, questioning whether the timing is appropriate as inflation might rebound in forthcoming monthsThey underscore the risks posed by rising inflation expectations, which could lead to lasting upward pressures.

Additionally, others focus on signals of weakness in the labor marketDeutsche Bank economist Sanjay Raja observes that the unemployment rate could rise more swiftly than anticipated, with the Bank’s forecast now suggesting an increase to 4.6%. In response, monetary policy may communicate a slightly dovish stance, more explicitly signaling an intention to lower rates.

The Bank of England has refrained from disclosing its estimates concerning the neutral interest rateNew Monetary Policy Committee member Alan Taylor has indicated that the neutral rate approximates around 2.75%. Meanwhile, a survey indicates that most respondents believe the neutral rate falls between 3% and 3.5%.

The upcoming budget review scheduled for February will also attract the Bank's attentionEarly indicators suggest that a £26 billion (approximately $32.6 billion) increase in national insurance contributions could result in a greater pass-through effect to consumers via price hikes than initially assumed, thereby elevating inflationThe Bank may also consider fiscal measures introduced by Reeves last week, such as the planned expansion of Heathrow Airport with a third runway.

Lastly, delays in U.S. tariff implementations affecting Mexico, Canada, and China now lie outside of the Bank's projectionsWhile the U.SPresident has temporarily suspended tariffs on Canada and Mexico, threats remain if those countries do not meet U.S. border security requirementsBailey has historically reiterated his preference for free trade, claiming to be fundamentally a classical free trader—believing that openness in trade fosters competition, innovation, and specialization, which ultimately boost productivity.

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements